Wednesday, October 31, 2007

SHOULD THERE BE A FEDERAL LAW AGAINST THE CHARACTER ASSASSINATION OF A U.S. PRESIDENT?

The "inside job" theory of who caused the 9-11 atrocity has reached the altitude NASA uses when they apply their jargon about the spacecraft having gone too far to turn back. That is to say that it appears to have accelerated far enough to begin to cause some serious and long-lasting mental trauma to the American institute of education. Is there even an educational institution remaining in this nation considering the plight of the public schools. The "inside job" theory about the day America was attacked by a now defined enemy of America and America's freedoms, is one of the most outrageous and hateful exercises of free speech that I have ever witnessed. In a nutshell, the theory blatantly accuses President George W. Bush of the slaughter of more than 3,000 innocent people; this inside theory about the President being guilty of conspiring with other American officials, political and military, to commit what would be the worst massacre of American citizens in the history of the United States. In terms used to describe such heinous crimes, the scenes of these premeditated murders were absent of bodies; the only evidence that young children, babies, adult men and women were murdered en masse was the few body parts found in the rubble of the two WTC building.


Never in my conscious imagination did I ever suspect this crime against humanity and America was caused by an American. To suspect that the human beings who premeditated such a criminal execution and burning slaughter was the President of the United States of America and some of his staff never entered my mind; surely it was the one crime the President would never be accused of masterminding. In my mind,the zaniest of the zany partisans would never try to cast suspicions on the President or any American government official with such a crime. I was wrong. As the smoke and ash settled, rumors abounded inside of America's prisons and mental facilities "Inside job, inside job!" Patients and the prisoners concocted lengthy and detailed narratives about who did it and how it was done.
As incarcerated inmates and mental patients related their lies, reporters from the networks listened and took notes, whispering to their associates about what kind of political impact headlines of that nature would have on public opinion about the Republican administration. Brutal as this might sound, it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
When it comes to political assassination, there are no blanks. This type of insanity inside some of the nations newspapers became clearly visible in newsprint. "It was Bush and Chaney," stated an individual interviewed in a man-on-street type of interview. "No, no, no, "I said to myself. "Not another conspiracy theory, but yes, yes, yes." And then I heard the guarantee of an encore when radio hosts said:"Another conspiracy theory is brewing."
Mention of the possibility of a genuine Presidential involvement was audible on network television; minor and ineffective politicians with reputations for minds that suffered frequent electrical interference began lining up at the podiums for their opportunity to cast accusations. Time passed. Then, as one might have anticipated, Hollywood reared its ugly head and the "Inside job" propaganda was born without the slightest labor pain.
At last, Hollywood had all the backdrops they needed, the fine-tooth editors were working overtime searching for ways to edit or rewrite statements. One director and producer after another met with screenwriters high up in the Hollywood Hills to create the body of evidence they felt was needed to make such a production believable. They had no problem with belief,they had already vowed to believe each other's lies, but they were smart enough to know that most Americans wouldn't buy such outlandish accusations without some kind of evidence. Thus, it was up to them, the elite group of malcontents who hate America and everything about America except the currency, those anti-patriotic partisans whose only pledge of allegiance is to their own vanity to make America believe that President George Bush ordered the World Trade Center 9/11 Massacre.
Who are these people accusing the President of murder? I do not have to mention their names, America knows their names. And most Americans, I believe, have an opinion about these celebrities who are using their every energy and millions of dollars to undermine the credibility of the President and the United States. Can these losers be prosecuted for treason or sedition? Evidently not, thanks to freedom of speech. What can be done to combat these enemies from within? Perhaps we can hope that their tax records will be examined time and again; we can hope that they are refused their favorite seats at their favorite posh dinner houses; we can hope that what friends they have left will begin to be concerned about their own public relations image and delete these ex-television hosts from their address books. The movie producers and directors can be disciplined for their lies and disrespect through shunning them and their anti-American propaganda. And finally, we can pray that they will renounce their American citizenship and leave America, never to return, never to soil its gentle earth again. Can we then, with smiles, wave good riddance to the likes of __________, ___________, and _______________. Unfortunately, their absence might be short-lived. I recall barges filled with garbage and trash we tried to export to Europe? They were refused and returned to America.
One major concern of mine is that the textbook publishers will fall prey to such lies and further deteriorate the history of the United States. Monitoring textbooks is simple enough, but we need to be listening for comments that might . Listening to our children's comments about what happened at school is highly recommended. Be listening for the first comment you hear them make about the 9-11 tragedy. If you hear a child make a comment about how President Bush and his friends made the World Trade Center explode and fall down, we will know it's time to make some serious changes in our nation's education system. But, of course, we were already aware of this ...weren't we?

1 comment:

krazywithak4u said...

should there be a law........
well i am all over the place in my politics in many ways.i do believe one of the many reasons we are hated so much by the middle east,our attackers,etc,is the fact we do have free speach.they laugh at us when we insult out government and it only serves to hurt us in thier eyes.'they' see all the slander we write and say about ourselves,our discontent. it gives them strength in thier convictions against us.i do believe in freedome of speach.its our right as americans.some,though seem to think that gives the right to damage and destroy poeple's lives and our country.are they just misguided?unaware? or does almost everyone now just hate our president,even us?i am not a G.W. fan,frankly.but he is our president and respect follows.!I AM A FAN OF AMERICAN FREEDOM AND THE IDEA'S WE TRY TO FOLLOW wHAT OUR FOUNDERS WERE BRAVE ENOUGH TO WRITE DOWN AND MAKE FIRM.
assassination of character for out leaders is wrong,well for any one to have it happen to them would understand that.but the world watches us! the world see's our own disrespect for 'our own'...why should the world then respect our leader's or us, as a country?
one of the things i love about our country are the freedoms we share,in many area's.sad to say ,some have freedoms and some dont have any.money talks here,in many respects.WHERE DOES ONE DRaW THE LINE IN THIS AREA?i dont want to see people carted off in the middle of the night as in other countries.my opinion, we as a nation have taken free speach too far.i cant say yes or no on the 'federla law' point. i do think though it is a subject to ponder and be disgussed.i was happy to read something on a topic,[any topic]not sugar coated.